The £550 Financial Ombudsman fee coming YOUR way…

legal updates

Finance companies will also get dealers to have to re-pay them any fee that the finance company has to pay the Financial Ombudsman Service.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

My colleague Roxanne wrote a legal update recently advising of the “small print” in the agreements that you may have with a finance companies that give them the right to terminate the entire agreement (usually hire-purchase) if their customer fails to collect the vehicle within a certain timescale.

I remind clients now of the fact that finance companies will also get dealers to have to re-pay them any fee that the finance company has to pay the Financial Ombudsman Service (“the Ombudsman”) for them to adjudicate on any dispute.  Even where the Ombudsman rules that the customer has no justified claim at all, the finance company will refer to the terms and conditions they have with dealers to get that fee back from them.  

The current fee is £550 for each case the Ombudsman has referred to it from each finance provider.  Save, that is, for the first 25 complaints passed to it by the finance company in a year.  Of course, the biggest finance companies will rattle through these quite quickly given that they finance thousands of transactions – and consumers are often notoriously difficult to please!

What we find though is that those finance companies are very keen to use this re-imbursement of the Ombudsman’s fee to “encourage” clients to unwind finance deals even when we feel that there is no legal reason to justify a reversal.

And so clients must be aware that sometimes they just have to make decisions based on pure economics rather than on law or on fact – however painful it might be to do so.

HaswentWebsites for dealers small and large

Composer is a next-gen automotive platform that has been designed from the ground up to give you an intuitive way to promote your stock. You have extensive stock management options, and you'll gain a brilliantly responsive new website to advertise your stock, starting at just £39.99/month.

Jason WilliamsLegal AdvisorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Motor Traders have protection under s.27 of the Hire Purchase Act

Told that s.27 offers Motor Traders no protection at all? Not so. A private purchaser’s good title can flow through the chain to protect dealers, and we map out when it does and when it doesn’t.

Motor Finance Commissions: Supreme Court Slashes £44 Billion Payout, but Are Dealers Really Off the Hook?

The Supreme Court’s August ruling wiped most of the eye-watering £44 billion redress bill off the table, yet thousands of drivers could still pocket compensation when the FCA unveils its new scheme next year. Here’s what the decision really means for lenders, dealers and consumers.

Broker Falls Flat: Court Dismisses Flimsy Claim Against Dealer

A County Court ruling has reinforced the importance of solid evidence and clear contracts, rejecting a broker’s claim against a car dealer over an alleged pre-existing fault.

Coincidence or Cause? When Timing Leads to Claims

A motorcycle engine seized just 30 miles after a service, sparking a claim of negligence. Find out how this case unfolded in court and why coincidence doesn’t always mean liability.

AI is the future – but treat it with care!

AI can be a powerful ally—but recent cases show its misuse can lead to serious consequences, even contempt of court.

The devil is in the detail

A solid report can make or break your legal case, but even minor mistakes can be costly. Learn what details to double-check in vehicle reports and how to avoid common pitfalls that could undermine your evidence in court.

Recent Cases, Real Consequences – and What to Learn

From missed emails to misplaced vehicles, here are a few real-world reminders to help you avoid unnecessary headaches.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.