Consumer Rights Act 2015 – Rejects and refunds

legal updates

Looks like you would have to give a refund within 14 days of the customer exercising their right to reject.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

We have had some queries recently on how quickly a refund will have to be given if a consumer rejects the vehicle within the first 30 days of ownership when the new Consumer Rights Act comes into force.

The legislation says that a refund should be given “without undue delay, and in any event within 14 days beginning with the day on which the trader agrees that the consumer is entitled to a refund.”

This, at first sight, looks like you would have to give a refund within 14 days of the customer exercising their right to reject. This could obviously be very problematic if the logbook has not been returned from the DVLA yet! As we all know this can take weeks and you may find yourself having to give a refund without the logbook having been returned from the DVLA which would obviously not be sensible at all.

We are therefore suggesting that you advise consumers, either in your terms and conditions or on your sales invoice that you do not agree that they are entitled to  a refund until they have possession of the logbook back from the DVLA. This way you will not have to give a refund until 14 days from the date the logbook is returned. This will hopefully ease the pressures of having to give refunds very quickly if a consumer is entitled to one but also avoid the situation where you have to give a refund for a vehicle without a logbook!

The above advice also applies to giving a refund after the first 30 days, however, we imagine this would only apply if there are real delays with the DVLA service.

We would advise that this, and all of our suggestions, are in place before the 1st October 2015 to comply with the new legislation which comes into force from that date.

InvolutionSTAFF UNIFORM | PROMOTIONAL WEAR | MERCHANDISE | BUSINESS GIFTS

Leading experts in print, promotional clothing, staff uniforms, branded merchandise and PPE. Involution is your brand partner for promotional marketing and workwear, a one-stop-shop for your branded marketing needs for any business size and industry.

Stephanie StrachanIn remembrance of Stephanie Strachan 1990-2020Read More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Experts vs. “Garage Reports”: The evidence edge that could win your case

Garage reports can help, but only CPR Part 35 expert evidence tends to swing a dispute. Before costs spiral, here’s how and when to use experts to protect your position with consumers, businesses, and finance companies.

“Running Well”: Two words that cost a consumer £3,300

The judge found our member’s repairs were sound and ruled the email undercut the later allegations, dismissing the claim and awarding expenses.

The photo you didn’t take could cost you thousands

Proving a vehicle’s condition at handover is the difference between recovering costs and footing the bill.

They Broke It, You Don’t Pay: Intervening Acts that defend dealer claims

When damage stems from what a customer did after purchase, you may not be on the hook.

Is the legislative framework outdated or misunderstood?

A claimant mixed pre-2015 laws with a post-2015 car purchase and the result was, frankly, embarrassing.

Come On, Baby, Light My Fire

If a car goes up in smoke, does the buyer’s insurance mean the trader escapes liability? Here’s how insurer involvement really works…

Don’t Get Soaked: The Habitation Checks That Stop Motorhome Rejections

Buyers are rejecting motorhomes for damp, leaks and unsafe cabins. Here’s what to inspect in the habitation area and why a simple pre-sale check can save you a costly Consumer Rights Act dispute.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.