Insurer and warranty do battle – Templeton Insurance Ltd v Motor Care Warranties Ltd 2010

legal updates

There were allegations Motorcare had wrongly authorised policies for higher risk vehicles and not paid over the correct premiums.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

A dispute arose between the sellers of mechanical breakdown insurance, Templeton Insurance Ltd and the UK agents Motorcare Warranties Ltd. 

The trading arrangement broke down when warranty breakdown claims began to exceed premiums.

Furthermore there were allegations Motorcare had wrongly authorised policies for higher risk vehicles such as taxis, had not paid over the premiums at the correct split and Templeton considered Motorcare knew the loss ratios were higher but failed to tell Templeton thereby misrepresenting the potential for likely insurance claims.

Wearewood Services LtdMotor Trade Web Specialists

We offer an all-encompassing web, digital & design service specially tailored to the Motor Industry.

Dennis ChapmanIn remembrance of Dennis Chapman 1951 -2015Read More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Lawgistics review WarrantyFirst Car Warranty Policies

We continue our journey reviewing aftermarket warranties and our next stop, WarrantyFirst.

2024: The Year of Smarter Warranties in the Motor Trade

Unlocking 2024’s Potential: Discover how our revolutionary warranty management system can transform your business profits and efficiency!

Lawgsitics review Autoguard Warranties

How far above and beyond consumer rights do aftermarket warranties go?

Lawgistics review Warrantywise Car Warranty

How far above and beyond consumer rights do aftermarket warranties go?

Lawgistics review RAC Maintenance and Repair Plans

How far above and beyond consumer rights do aftermarket warranties go?

Motor Vehicle Block Exemption Regulation (MBVER) changes for May 2023

Updated guidance to ensure the warranties provided to consumers clearly state that they are able to use independent retailers without losing the benefit of their warranty.

Remember to read the instructions

With newer vehicles, depending on the warranty period provided, the manufacturer may instruct the trader to undertake certain tests and to certain standards so they are able to entertain a warranty claim.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.