Author: Nicola Porter
Published: May 12, 2015
Reading time: 1 minute
This article is 7 years old.
Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down
This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.
The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.
The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.
Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.
If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.
All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.
Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.
In a recent Tribunal case, the issue about what is and is not included within the scope of ‘Working Time’ has been re-examined.
As you will be aware, employees are entitled to a daily rest period of 11 hours within a 24 hour period. This case concerned shift workers, who had to attend meetings before or after their shifts, which infringed on their 11 hour rest period. The employees argued these meetings should therefore be considered as working time, and therefore their employer was in breach of the Working Time Regulations.
The Tribunal agreed with the employees, that these meetings did form part of their working day and as such would be considered ‘Working Time’. This was on the basis that it formed a fundamental part of their job role and as such their attendance at them was essential.
It is therefore clear that employers need to consider all duties employees undertake and ensure that employees are being provided with the correct rest periods.
As always our Members can receive employment law advice over the telephone.