When no title means no sale

legal updates

Four years after selling a Range Rover, a trader was hit with a demand for a full refund when the vehicle was seized in Spain.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

Our member purchased a left-hand drive Range Rover in 2019. It had been used by the previous owner to travel between the UK and a property in Spain. At the time of purchase, our member paid off the outstanding finance, which amounted to £15,000.

The vehicle was later sold in 2020 to a new owner, who also intended to use it for travelling between Spain and the UK. The new owner even fitted the vehicle with a cherished registration.

However, four years later, our member received an email from the buyer explaining that the car had been subject to police checks in Spain. The Spanish authorities had determined that the vehicle was stolen in France in 2014 and that it legally belonged to a French insurance company. The buyer reported being told that the vehicle would not be returned to him and demanded a full refund. Our member referred the matter to their insurers, as they held the relevant cover.

The law surrounding conversion is complex. In this case, the original owner, now a French insurance company, holds the legal right to take action against the converter, not our client’s buyer. However, under the Consumer Rights Act 2015, a generous remedy is provided for consumers who purchase a vehicle from a trader that does not have the title to sell it: the right to reject the goods and receive a full refund.

In such situations, the usual 30-day limit for the short-term right to reject does not apply, and no deductions can be made for the consumer’s use of the vehicle.

The key legal principle here is Nemo dat quod non habet – “no one can give what they do not have.” This means that a person or entity who does not legally own a vehicle cannot pass good title to another. As a result, the consumer is entitled to a full refund, even after several years of vehicle use, because in effect, the contract never legally existed.

If you are facing a similar issue involving title disputes or stolen vehicles, our legal team can help you understand your obligations and protect your position. Lawgistics members also benefit from expert guidance and support on insurance matters, ownership verification, and consumer rights.

Wearewood Services LtdMotor Trade Web Specialists

We offer an all-encompassing web, digital & design service specially tailored to the Motor Industry.

Related Legal Updates

Coincidence or Cause? When Timing Leads to Claims

A motorcycle engine seized just 30 miles after a service, sparking a claim of negligence. Find out how this case unfolded in court and why coincidence doesn’t always mean liability.

Elusive Vehicle Noises: What to Do When You Can’t Find the Fault

More customers are reporting strange noises that seem impossible to trace. Learn practical steps to recreate, record, and address these elusive issues while protecting your business.

The power of expert evidence in vehicle disputes

Our member never claimed the 5-year-old, multi-owner car was perfect.

Section 23 – Consumers Rights Act 2015 (CRA2015)

The judge determined our member was liable for the repair, despite the clear MOT and trouble-free driving over three months.

The customer isn’t always right…

As it was a defect he knew about, he cannot now claim it renders the vehicle not fit for purpose or not of satisfactory quality.

Burden of proof? Get your evidence while you can!

The burden of proof reverses for issues raised between 30 days and six months of ownership.

On your Marks… Get Set… Doh!

The TSO told our member that the consumer ought not to have experienced a failure given the age and mileage of the car.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.