When no title means no sale

legal updates

Four years after selling a Range Rover, a trader was hit with a demand for a full refund when the vehicle was seized in Spain.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

Our member purchased a left-hand drive Range Rover in 2019. It had been used by the previous owner to travel between the UK and a property in Spain. At the time of purchase, our member paid off the outstanding finance, which amounted to £15,000.

The vehicle was later sold in 2020 to a new owner, who also intended to use it for travelling between Spain and the UK. The new owner even fitted the vehicle with a cherished registration.

However, four years later, our member received an email from the buyer explaining that the car had been subject to police checks in Spain. The Spanish authorities had determined that the vehicle was stolen in France in 2014 and that it legally belonged to a French insurance company. The buyer reported being told that the vehicle would not be returned to him and demanded a full refund. Our member referred the matter to their insurers, as they held the relevant cover.

The law surrounding conversion is complex. In this case, the original owner, now a French insurance company, holds the legal right to take action against the converter, not our client’s buyer. However, under the Consumer Rights Act 2015, a generous remedy is provided for consumers who purchase a vehicle from a trader that does not have the title to sell it: the right to reject the goods and receive a full refund.

In such situations, the usual 30-day limit for the short-term right to reject does not apply, and no deductions can be made for the consumer’s use of the vehicle.

The key legal principle here is Nemo dat quod non habet – “no one can give what they do not have.” This means that a person or entity who does not legally own a vehicle cannot pass good title to another. As a result, the consumer is entitled to a full refund, even after several years of vehicle use, because in effect, the contract never legally existed.

If you are facing a similar issue involving title disputes or stolen vehicles, our legal team can help you understand your obligations and protect your position. Lawgistics members also benefit from expert guidance and support on insurance matters, ownership verification, and consumer rights.

ECSC Group plcMore Secure

On average 55 vulnerabilities are identified daily.

What can I do?

Review your organisations priorities and ask ‘can we afford a breach?’. What do I do during an incident? Who do I involve? When do I involve the ICO?

If you’re unable to answers these questions, you need help from the experts.

Related Legal Updates

Navigating the Return of Part-Exchange Vehicles

When a financed car sale is rejected, what happens to the part-exchange (and its cleared finance) is rarely straightforward.

Car Trouble Years Later: Who’s to Blame, the Customer or the Trader?

When a fault surfaces years after a sale, who carries the burden under the Consumer Rights Act 2015? Here’s the quick guide traders need to protect their position and respond confidently.

Rejection Rights Aren’t ‘Refund on Demand’: What the CRA 2015 Really Expects

A vociferous rejection doesn’t trump the trader’s right to inspect or make a fair deduction for use. We unpack what “agreement” really means under the CRA 2015.

Experts vs. “Garage Reports”: The evidence edge that could win your case

Garage reports can help, but only CPR Part 35 expert evidence tends to swing a dispute. Before costs spiral, here’s how and when to use experts to protect your position with consumers, businesses, and finance companies.

“Running Well”: Two words that cost a consumer £3,300

The judge found our member’s repairs were sound and ruled the email undercut the later allegations, dismissing the claim and awarding expenses.

The photo you didn’t take could cost you thousands

Proving a vehicle’s condition at handover is the difference between recovering costs and footing the bill.

They Broke It, You Don’t Pay: Intervening Acts that defend dealer claims

When damage stems from what a customer did after purchase, you may not be on the hook.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.