Watch thy mouth

legal_updates

In a recent Employment Tribunal case, a Christian employee claimed to have been harassed by other members of staff by their use of the words ‘God’ and ‘Jesus Christ’ in workplace conversation

Author: Dennis Chapman
Published:
Reading time: 1 minute

This article is 8 years old.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

Employers and employees must be careful when using certain words within the workplace, as they could be seen to be committing religious discrimination.

In a recent Employment Tribunal case, a Christian employee claimed to have been harassed by other members of staff by their use of the words ‘God’ and ‘Jesus Christ’ in workplace conversation. The employee felt this harassment amounted to religious discrimination.

The Tribunal held that the use of such language was not a form of harassment on the grounds that the comments were not directed at that employee specifically and that the same language was used whether that employee was or was not present.

The Tribunal highlighted here that under the Equality Act 2010, harassment on religious grounds which is unintentional, will mean finding a balance between whether the conduct was reasonable, or if, on balance, it was reasonable to infer that from the Claimants perspective the actions were discriminatory.  

In this case the Tribunal did not consider this to be the case, as the words used were commonly used, swearwords, despite being blasphemous in nature. Therefore there was no harassment of anyone of a religious disposition.

Dennis Chapman

In remembrance of Dennis Chapman 1951 -2015

Read more by this author

Getting in touch

You can contact us via the form or you can call us on 01480 455500.