Small Claims and Expert Fees: Understanding the £750 Cap

legal updates

Parties should carefully consider the necessity and proportionality of obtaining expert evidence to avoid incurring irrecoverable costs.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

There is a limit on the recoverable costs for expert reports in cases allocated to the small claims track in England and Wales where the amount sought is less than £10,000.

The Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) and Practice Direction 27A limit the recoverable costs for expert reports in small claims track cases to £750 per expert.

This limit applies regardless of the nature of the evidence and is designed to ensure proportionality in costs within low-value disputes.

Where a party incurs expert fees exceeding £750, the excess amount is generally not recoverable from the opposing party. However, the court retains discretion to allow or limit expert evidence and may, where appropriate, restrict or disallow the recovery of expert fees.

The use of expert evidence requires the court’s permission, and the party seeking to obtain or rely on evidence must demonstrate that the evidence is necessary and proportionate to the value and complexity of the claim.

Parties should carefully consider the necessity and proportionality of obtaining expert evidence to avoid incurring irrecoverable costs. Expert reports can be instrumental, especially in mechanical matters, though their involvement may not always be financially viable.

If the decision is made to instruct an expert, the instructions should be clear and informative. Lawgistics offers support in drafting instructions to ensure clarity and compliance with CPR Part 35, which governs the use of expert evidence in proceedings.

If you’ve had a similar issue or are unsure how to proceed with expert evidence, why not call our legal team at Lawgistics for guidance?

InvolutionSTAFF UNIFORM | PROMOTIONAL WEAR | MERCHANDISE | BUSINESS GIFTS

Leading experts in print, promotional clothing, staff uniforms, branded merchandise and PPE. Involution is your brand partner for promotional marketing and workwear, a one-stop-shop for your branded marketing needs for any business size and industry.

Natalia KepinskaSolicitorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Mediation appointments: the court’s take on ‘delays’

You can tell the court you’re unavailable, but will that stop a telephone mediation being listed? In our client’s case it didn’t, and the refusal to move it now means a full hearing next year.

Witness Statements: Own the Weakness and Turn Up to Court

Courts are scrutinising credibility more than ever. A Witness Statement that ducks its weak points or a witness who fails to attend risks serious damage to their case

Broker Falls Flat: Court Dismisses Flimsy Claim Against Dealer

A County Court ruling has reinforced the importance of solid evidence and clear contracts, rejecting a broker’s claim against a car dealer over an alleged pre-existing fault.

Buyer Beware: £4K Discovery claim falls flat in court

An opportunistic claim for nearly £9,000 on a £4,000 used vehicle was thrown out by the court, reinforcing the principle of caveat emptor in business-to-business sales.

Two Years of Lawgistics Litigation Support

Since launching Lawgistics Litigation for the Motor Trade, we’ve saved our members over £2.6 million in court claims.

Of Pedantry and Pleadings

From faulty sat navs to forgotten responsibilities, we explore how modern claims are testing the limits of common sense in legal disputes.

Concise or Incomplete? The challenges of vague pleadings by litigants in person

As online claims get shorter, your courtroom strategy needs to get sharper. Here’s why.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.