Sale of Goods Law Rights

legal updates

Many dealers do not appreciate that if a vehicle shows a fault within a few weeks the customer can claim for a full refund.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

The rights and remedies for consumers under Sale of Goods law is in need of an update since it is confusing both for the customer and the dealer. 

Originally, the customer, if they established there was a fault had the choice of either:- 

a) getting a full refund (rejecting the goods) providing they opted for this within, usually, a few weeks of finding the vehicle was faulty when sold. 

b) getting compensation which had to be kept to a minimum (mitigated) and, of course, frequently involved the dealer repairing the fault. 

Many dealers do not appreciate that if a vehicle shows a fault within a few weeks the customer can claim for a full refund. There is a myth that the dealer should always be allowed to try a repair.  Not so.  Often the customer can be encouraged to allow a repair but this is a bonus. The right of rejection has a big bearing on the consequences of the case.  A lot of vehicles sold cost more than £5000 means that, if a solicitor gets involved, it can claim its costs which for a simple case can amount to another £5000 easily. So beware of fighting such a case if the outcome is doubtful. 
Another myth is that the dealer should have three chances to repair before the customer can have their money back.  Again, not so! 

The Sale of Goods legislation was then extended to allow extra remedies if a vehicle is not of satisfactory quality when sold. 

The extra choices are:- 

c) a repair or replacement 

If these are chosen then they must be completed without significant inconvenience to the customer. However, the dealer can decline either repair or replacement if one is disproportionately costly in comparison with the alternative.  So, the requirement for a £1500 replacement engine on a £2000 car would be disproportionately costly compared with getting the customer into another vehicle at £2000 or thereabouts. 

If neither repair or replacement is realistically possible then the customer can request instead:- 

HaswentWebsites for dealers small and large

Composer is a next-gen automotive platform that has been designed from the ground up to give you an intuitive way to promote your stock. You have extensive stock management options, and you'll gain a brilliantly responsive new website to advertise your stock, starting at just £39.99/month.

d) a partial or full refund 

If the customer has had some significant use before the problem materialised then only a partial refund is available 

The six month rule for establishing liability only applies to these additional remedies and not the basic previous remedies of rejection/compensation.

Dennis ChapmanIn remembrance of Dennis Chapman 1951 -2015Read More by this author

Related Legal Updates

AI is the future – but treat it with care!

AI can be a powerful ally—but recent cases show its misuse can lead to serious consequences, even contempt of court.

The devil is in the detail

A solid report can make or break your legal case, but even minor mistakes can be costly. Learn what details to double-check in vehicle reports and how to avoid common pitfalls that could undermine your evidence in court.

Major changes to UK Consumer Law have landed

The Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 has introduced sweeping updates to UK consumer law, including powerful new enforcement tools for the CMA.

When principle costs you the case

What started as a bold claim ‘on principle’ quickly unravelled into a costly courtroom lesson in getting your facts, and your legal standing, straight.

Recent Cases, Real Consequences – and What to Learn

From missed emails to misplaced vehicles, here are a few real-world reminders to help you avoid unnecessary headaches.

Legal Disputes: Why traders should avoid direct contact

The urge to sort the matter out, or attempt to, can put a strain on the process and you may find yourself in a difficult position.

The etiquette of handling consumer complaints

It is always best practice to get involved while you have the chance and follow the correct process at the very beginning.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.