Motor Finance Commission Claims: FCA and SRA Crack Down on CMCs, Fees and Misleading Adverts

legal updates

The FCA and SRA have issued clear reminders to Claims Management Companies and law firms: check customers are not already represented, keep termination fees fair, and stop misleading promotions.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) and Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) are reminding claims management companies (CMCs) and law firms involved in motor finance commission claims that they are expected to have stringent checks in place to ensure that a consumer has not instructed another representative for the same issue.

If a consumer wishes to terminate an agreement or switch representative, firms must not charge unfair fees. Any fees charged must be reasonable and reflect the work carried out. Fees charged by FCA-regulated CMCs must be fair in line with the consumer duty. Following a review by the FCA, two FCA-regulated CMCs have agreed to change their termination policies.

The FCA has made it very clear that, before starting a case, CMCs are expected to confirm that a customer has not already instructed another representative. Sarah Rapson, Chief Executive of the SRA, has stated that “protecting consumers is our priority”. “We expect firms we regulate to abide by the SRAs clear standards and regulations.” The FCA and SRA will continue to monitor the conduct of CMCs and law firms where poor practices are identified.

The FCA has increased its monitoring of financial promotions that had led to the removal of more than 800 misleading adverts by FCA-regulated CMCs since January 2024. The FCA recently opened an investigation into a CMC following concerns about its advertising and sales tactics in relation to potential motor finance commission claims.

The FCA is due to launch an advertising campaign to warn consumers about scammers pretending to be car finance lenders and falsely claiming that people are owed compensation, despite there being no such scheme in place.

SRA guidance on claims management activity: the SRA has updated its guidance in relation to claims management activity. Certain events, such as Payment Protection Insurance (PPI) or the Citroën airbag safety recall, have resulted in a high number of consumers being entitled to redress, which can lead to a high volume of claims in a short period of time. All firms should undertake claims management activity efficiently and at a fair and reasonable cost. Firms must act in their client’s best interests and must not take unfair advantage of third parties.

In the case of Citroën, the company issued an urgent stop-drive recall in 2025 for approximately 160,000 vehicles linked to unsafe airbags. CMCs acting for consumers were looking to seek compensation for loss of use, alternative transport costs and depreciation. Many dealers were overwhelmed, as repairs were prolonged and caused significant inconvenience.

The Supreme Court decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Limited & Others of 1 August 2025 decided that, in certain specific circumstances, motor finance companies may have entered into unfair relationships with consumers, meaning that the commission will be repayable. It also decided that car dealers did not have to prioritise consumers’ interests over their own. On this basis, some motor finance consumers with commission disclosure claims will not be entitled to compensation.

On 7 October 2025, the FCA published its consultation on an industry-wide scheme to compensate motor finance consumers who were treated unfairly between 2007 and 2024. The consultation has now closed. The FCA expects to publish final rules on the redress scheme in 2026.

The SRA has noted that all firms must familiarise themselves with the judgement in the Johnson case and consider its impact on existing and prospective clients. Firms should inform clients of the realistic prospects of an FCA-led redress scheme being introduced. The SRA has also stated that firms that use CMCs for motor finance referrals must comply with FCA regulations.

ECSC Group plcMore Secure

On average 55 vulnerabilities are identified daily.

What can I do?

Review your organisations priorities and ask ‘can we afford a breach?’. What do I do during an incident? Who do I involve? When do I involve the ICO?

If you’re unable to answers these questions, you need help from the experts.

If you have had the same issue, or are unsure where you stand on a potential motor finance commission claim, why not call our legal team at Lawgistics. Our telephone helpline and casework service can help you understand your options and the likely next steps.

Asif BhimaniSolicitorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Navigating the Return of Part-Exchange Vehicles

When a financed car sale is rejected, what happens to the part-exchange (and its cleared finance) is rarely straightforward.

FCA’s Motor Finance Crackdown: Has the horse already bolted?

The FCA has opened an enforcement investigation into a CMC over motor finance claims, but critics say this should have happened years ago.

Sold a Car and Now They Want a Refund? The Truth About “No Mental Capacity”

A refund demand lands after the sale, claiming the buyer lacked mental capacity. Here’s how to handle these calls, what actually counts as evidence, and when a contract could be void.

Motor Finance Consumer Redress Scheme

The FCA has launched a consultation on a motor finance redress scheme that could see average payouts of around £700 where key commission arrangements were not disclosed.

The FCA £1m Campaign: Better Late Than Never!

The FCA has launched a £1 million campaign to tell motor finance customers they can access compensation without claims firms or lawyers.

Proving the ‘chain of custody’ can be a challenge

Conflicting interests on a used car can turn a simple purchase into a legal minefield. Here’s how to evidence the chain, challenge a finance claim, and spot the red flags before you hand over the cash.

Motor Finance Commissions: Supreme Court Slashes £44 Billion Payout, but Are Dealers Really Off the Hook?

The Supreme Court’s August ruling wiped most of the eye-watering £44 billion redress bill off the table, yet thousands of drivers could still pocket compensation when the FCA unveils its new scheme next year. Here’s what the decision really means for lenders, dealers and consumers.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.