Is it time to ditch “Dear Sirs”?

legal updates

Clearly, “Dear Sirs” is old-fashioned, but is it sexist?

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

I did not give it much thought until International Women’s Day 2024 when I was confronted by my opponent, a female director of a law firm.

“Dear Sirs” has been traditionally used to begin a letter to a company when the writer did not have someone’s name to write to directly.

Being a woman myself, I had no particular stance on the issue, as it was second nature to start all my written communication with the salutation “Dear Sirs”. I spent most of my legal career in private practice in the City of London where “Dear Sirs” was commonly used in written communication. However, on this year’s International Women’s Day, I discovered that some people were actually offended by the salutation “Dear Sirs”.

My opponent replied to my email correspondence stating I didn’t need to address them as “Dear Sirs”.  After going back and forth as to whether the salutation “Dear Sirs” was acceptable in a situation where the recipient was unknown, I discovered that the Law Society of Ireland discontinued the use of the “Dear Sirs” salutation in 2020. 

President of the Law Society of Ireland, Michelle O’Boyle, said, “In a move to make our written communications reflect a more equal, diverse and inclusive profession, the Law Society is encouraging all colleagues across the legal profession to retire the male-centric “Dear Sirs” phrase and adopt greetings that have a more inclusive modern approach.”

The Law Society of Ireland did, however, make it clear that it was entirely down to firms to decide whether or not to adopt an alternative salutation. In view of this, was it entirely appropriate or even reasonable for my opponent to challenge me for using the salutation “Dear Sirs”?

Meanwhile, in England, Freshfields Bruckhause Deringer, one of the UK’s leading law firms took the lead in 2016 and dropped the use of the salutation “Dear Sirs”. The Magic Circle firm announced that in written correspondence, it would use “Dear Sir or Madam” in the UK, and “Dear Ladies and Gentlemen” in the US.

In January 2021, a survey revealed that Scottish lawyers would like to see the salutation “Dear Sirs” dropped in recognition of the fact that not all lawyers are men.

In December 2022, the Law Society Gazette reported that the judiciary was taking steps to modernise the language of the courtroom by putting an end to district judges being addressed as “Sir” or “Madam”. 

More recently, in June 2023, the Law Society of Northern Ireland’s Human Rights and Equality Committee suggested solicitors should drop the “outdated and non-inclusive practice” in favour of alternatives such as “Dear Colleague”.

Automotive ComplianceWE TALK YOUR LANGUAGE, WE KNOW YOUR BUSINESS

Need help with keeping on track with FCA Regulation and Compliance? Partner with Automotive Compliance

Clearly, “Dear Sirs” is old-fashioned, but is it sexist? If it is sexist, should lawyers be mandated to drop the salutation “Dear Sirs”? 

Related Legal Updates

Finance Company Unhappy with Court Ruling

The court found that the claim and particulars were inadequate and the finance company was told they had to submit a compliant claim/particulars.

Disclose or not to disclose, that is the question

It is imperative that you know what is required to be disclosed, when to disclose the documents, and what your legal duty is both before proceedings and when a claim is issued.

Detailed records avoid post-sale issues

The Claimant was only entitled to compensation for the cost of repairs to the locks, which were considered likely to have been faulty at the point of sale and was awarded £385.

Claimant failed to satisfy the burden of proof

No real evidence to suggest the extant problems with his vehicle were in any way related to the repairs that had been undertaken

Metadata matters! Proving dates of evidence

Metadata means “data about data” and is defined as “the data providing information about one or more aspects of the data in question.”

I’m On The Register!!

If a judgment in default is issued, a CCJ is recorded immediately on the relevant credit file.

Time is Money – Pay Attention!

Whether the court has made a mistake that impacts your case, or if the postman has lost your court paperwork, as soon as an issue arises, action is needed.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.