Is it time to ditch “Dear Sirs”?

legal updates

Clearly, “Dear Sirs” is old-fashioned, but is it sexist?

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

I did not give it much thought until International Women’s Day 2024 when I was confronted by my opponent, a female director of a law firm.

“Dear Sirs” has been traditionally used to begin a letter to a company when the writer did not have someone’s name to write to directly.

Being a woman myself, I had no particular stance on the issue, as it was second nature to start all my written communication with the salutation “Dear Sirs”. I spent most of my legal career in private practice in the City of London where “Dear Sirs” was commonly used in written communication. However, on this year’s International Women’s Day, I discovered that some people were actually offended by the salutation “Dear Sirs”.

My opponent replied to my email correspondence stating I didn’t need to address them as “Dear Sirs”.  After going back and forth as to whether the salutation “Dear Sirs” was acceptable in a situation where the recipient was unknown, I discovered that the Law Society of Ireland discontinued the use of the “Dear Sirs” salutation in 2020. 

President of the Law Society of Ireland, Michelle O’Boyle, said, “In a move to make our written communications reflect a more equal, diverse and inclusive profession, the Law Society is encouraging all colleagues across the legal profession to retire the male-centric “Dear Sirs” phrase and adopt greetings that have a more inclusive modern approach.”

The Law Society of Ireland did, however, make it clear that it was entirely down to firms to decide whether or not to adopt an alternative salutation. In view of this, was it entirely appropriate or even reasonable for my opponent to challenge me for using the salutation “Dear Sirs”?

Meanwhile, in England, Freshfields Bruckhause Deringer, one of the UK’s leading law firms took the lead in 2016 and dropped the use of the salutation “Dear Sirs”. The Magic Circle firm announced that in written correspondence, it would use “Dear Sir or Madam” in the UK, and “Dear Ladies and Gentlemen” in the US.

In January 2021, a survey revealed that Scottish lawyers would like to see the salutation “Dear Sirs” dropped in recognition of the fact that not all lawyers are men.

In December 2022, the Law Society Gazette reported that the judiciary was taking steps to modernise the language of the courtroom by putting an end to district judges being addressed as “Sir” or “Madam”. 

More recently, in June 2023, the Law Society of Northern Ireland’s Human Rights and Equality Committee suggested solicitors should drop the “outdated and non-inclusive practice” in favour of alternatives such as “Dear Colleague”.

Profit BoxDevelop your people like your business depends on it

What most people don’t know is that talent development doesn’t have to be complicated, high risk or expensive. Once they integrate key development stages, the results can be remarkable. Empower your team. Lead your industry. We’re your strategic learning partner, driving performance by moving skills forward.

Clearly, “Dear Sirs” is old-fashioned, but is it sexist? If it is sexist, should lawyers be mandated to drop the salutation “Dear Sirs”? 

Related Legal Updates

To strike or not to strike

Courts are reluctant to strike out a claim or defence, even where there are procedural breaches. Here’s when CPR 3.4(2) genuinely applies, why summary judgment under Part 24 may be a better route, and what judges look for before taking the drastic step.

Don’t Ignore That Claim Form: How to stop enforcement and protect your credit

Got a claim form through the door? Here’s what to do first, how to avoid a County Court Judgment, what happens if enforcement starts, and when it’s smarter to settle and move on.

Default judgment but no claim form?

Here’s how to act quickly, get the paperwork you need, and give yourself the best chance of setting the judgment aside under rule 13.3.

Importance of taking your customers’ details!

Garages aren’t legally required to take a customer’s address before repair or sale, but skipping it can stall Torts notices and court action when vehicles are abandoned or not collected.

Mediation appointments: the court’s take on ‘delays’

You can tell the court you’re unavailable, but will that stop a telephone mediation being listed? In our client’s case it didn’t, and the refusal to move it now means a full hearing next year.

Witness Statements: Own the Weakness and Turn Up to Court

Courts are scrutinising credibility more than ever. A Witness Statement that ducks its weak points or a witness who fails to attend risks serious damage to their case

Broker Falls Flat: Court Dismisses Flimsy Claim Against Dealer

A County Court ruling has reinforced the importance of solid evidence and clear contracts, rejecting a broker’s claim against a car dealer over an alleged pre-existing fault.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.