How strong is your relationship with your warranty provider?

legal updates

Our client sells a warranty to their customer, customer makes a claim, warranty DOES NOT PAY OUT the claim, and customer is unhappy!

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

Many of our clients offer their customers a used car warranty through the big names in the warranty world. The websites and glossy brochures portray professionally run businesses, easy to contact, easy to claim, and quick pay outs. These relationships with our clients appear to be mutually beneficial and, on the face of it, provide a positive outcome for consumers.

However, what is the reality? Client sells a warranty to their customer, customer makes a claim, warranty pays out claim, and everybody is happy.

Let’s look at another scenario. Our client sells a warranty to their customer, customer makes a claim, warranty DOES NOT PAY OUT the claim, and customer is unhappy!

In a recent court case, the customer was so unhappy that they made a claim against our client and the warranty company. The customer’s warranty claim was rejected because of “wear and tear”, the customer claimed it was mechanical fault. I won’t go into the details, however, the interesting fact in this case was that our client’s warranty company claimed they were not liable as the contract is between the consumer and our client!

They effectively threw our client “under the bus” which as you can imagine was a complete shock as our client’s perception was that his warranty company dealt with the administration of the warranty and the claims process. Fortunately, the judge was having none of this and made it clear that the warranty company WAS liable. The customer’s claim was administered by the warranty company, and they were the ones refusing to pay the claim, not our client. Because of the complexities of the issues involved, the judge found that both our client and the warranty company were both jointly and severally liable. This was a huge relief to our client as he could have been facing a much larger bill.

That said, our client and his warranty provider have potentially now irreconcilable differences. You may want to check your warranty provider’s terms and conditions and your working relationship. Small claims are paid out, no questions asked, but when it comes to the larger claims, what really happens?

Is it time to re-evaluate your warranty provider and turn your warranty cost into a profit and improve your customer experience?

Contact Lawgistics and ask about our in-house warranty scheme.

ECSC Group plcMore Secure

On average 55 vulnerabilities are identified daily.

What can I do?

Review your organisations priorities and ask ‘can we afford a breach?’. What do I do during an incident? Who do I involve? When do I involve the ICO?

If you’re unable to answers these questions, you need help from the experts.

John McDougallLegal AdvisorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Lawgistics review WSG warranty offering

As with most of the warranties we have reviewed, WSG’s options are limited in going above and beyond a consumer’s statutory rights and also limit claims in other areas that would ordinarily be covered.

Lawgistics review WarrantyFirst Car Warranty Policies

We continue our journey reviewing aftermarket warranties and our next stop, WarrantyFirst.

2024: The Year of Smarter Warranties in the Motor Trade

Unlocking 2024’s Potential: Discover how our revolutionary warranty management system can transform your business profits and efficiency!

Lawgsitics review Autoguard Warranties

How far above and beyond consumer rights do aftermarket warranties go?

Lawgistics review Warrantywise Car Warranty

How far above and beyond consumer rights do aftermarket warranties go?

Lawgistics review RAC Maintenance and Repair Plans

How far above and beyond consumer rights do aftermarket warranties go?

Motor Vehicle Block Exemption Regulation (MBVER) changes for May 2023

Updated guidance to ensure the warranties provided to consumers clearly state that they are able to use independent retailers without losing the benefit of their warranty.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.