Don’t Get Caught Out: Why Your Car Warranty Won’t Shield You from the Consumer Rights Act

legal updates

Think a watertight warranty protects you from refund demands? Think again. We explain how the Consumer Rights Act trumps any small print and what dealers must do to stay safe, or risk costly claims.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

When traders provide warranties for vehicles, it is crucial to understand that these warranties are supplementary to and do not replace the statutory rights afforded to consumers under the Consumer Rights Act 2015 (CRA 2015). A trader’s liability is not limited to the terms and conditions of the warranty but extends to the consumer’s rights under the CRA 2015.

Section 30 of the CRA 2015 explicitly requires that any guarantee or warranty must state that the consumer’s statutory rights are not affected. This ensures that consumers retain their legal protections, such as the right to reject faulty goods, request repairs, or seek price reductions, regardless of the terms of the warranty.

The CRA 2015 provides that goods must meet certain standards, including being of satisfactory quality, fit for purpose, and as described. If a vehicle fails to meet these standards, consumers have specific remedies. Within the first 30 days, they can reject the vehicle and request a full refund if they provide evidence that the faults were present or developing at the point of sale. Between 30 days and six months, the trader bears the burden of proving that the fault did not exist at the time of sale. After six months, the consumer may still seek remedies, but they must provide evidence that the fault was present at the point of sale.

Importantly, warranties that attempt to limit or exclude these statutory rights are likely to be deemed unfair under the CRA 2015. Traders cannot rely on the terms and conditions of the warranties to restrict their liability towards the consumers.

Traders are advised to include clear and intelligible language in their warranty documents that explicitly states the consumer’s statutory rights remain unaffected.

Automotive ComplianceWE TALK YOUR LANGUAGE, WE KNOW YOUR BUSINESS

Need help with keeping on track with FCA Regulation and Compliance? Partner with Automotive Compliance

Nidhi ShahTrainee SolicitorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

30 Days to Hand the Keys Back: How the Short-Term Right to Reject Really Works

Think a new fault lets buyers walk away, no questions asked? Not quite. Discover why the burden of proof is on the consumer, and how dealers can stay one step ahead.

When no title means no sale

Four years after selling a Range Rover, a trader was hit with a demand for a full refund when the vehicle was seized in Spain.

Coincidence or Cause? When Timing Leads to Claims

A motorcycle engine seized just 30 miles after a service, sparking a claim of negligence. Find out how this case unfolded in court and why coincidence doesn’t always mean liability.

Elusive Vehicle Noises: What to Do When You Can’t Find the Fault

More customers are reporting strange noises that seem impossible to trace. Learn practical steps to recreate, record, and address these elusive issues while protecting your business.

The power of expert evidence in vehicle disputes

Our member never claimed the 5-year-old, multi-owner car was perfect.

Section 23 – Consumers Rights Act 2015 (CRA2015)

The judge determined our member was liable for the repair, despite the clear MOT and trouble-free driving over three months.

The customer isn’t always right…

As it was a defect he knew about, he cannot now claim it renders the vehicle not fit for purpose or not of satisfactory quality.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.