Don’t Get Caught Out: Why Your Car Warranty Won’t Shield You from the Consumer Rights Act

legal updates

Think a watertight warranty protects you from refund demands? Think again. We explain how the Consumer Rights Act trumps any small print and what dealers must do to stay safe, or risk costly claims.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

When traders provide warranties for vehicles, it is crucial to understand that these warranties are supplementary to and do not replace the statutory rights afforded to consumers under the Consumer Rights Act 2015 (CRA 2015). A trader’s liability is not limited to the terms and conditions of the warranty but extends to the consumer’s rights under the CRA 2015.

Section 30 of the CRA 2015 explicitly requires that any guarantee or warranty must state that the consumer’s statutory rights are not affected. This ensures that consumers retain their legal protections, such as the right to reject faulty goods, request repairs, or seek price reductions, regardless of the terms of the warranty.

The CRA 2015 provides that goods must meet certain standards, including being of satisfactory quality, fit for purpose, and as described. If a vehicle fails to meet these standards, consumers have specific remedies. Within the first 30 days, they can reject the vehicle and request a full refund if they provide evidence that the faults were present or developing at the point of sale. Between 30 days and six months, the trader bears the burden of proving that the fault did not exist at the time of sale. After six months, the consumer may still seek remedies, but they must provide evidence that the fault was present at the point of sale.

Importantly, warranties that attempt to limit or exclude these statutory rights are likely to be deemed unfair under the CRA 2015. Traders cannot rely on the terms and conditions of the warranties to restrict their liability towards the consumers.

Traders are advised to include clear and intelligible language in their warranty documents that explicitly states the consumer’s statutory rights remain unaffected.

HaswentWebsites for dealers small and large

Composer is a next-gen automotive platform that has been designed from the ground up to give you an intuitive way to promote your stock. You have extensive stock management options, and you'll gain a brilliantly responsive new website to advertise your stock, starting at just £39.99/month.

Nidhi ShahTrainee SolicitorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Don’t Get Soaked: The Habitation Checks That Stop Motorhome Rejections

Buyers are rejecting motorhomes for damp, leaks and unsafe cabins. Here’s what to inspect in the habitation area and why a simple pre-sale check can save you a costly Consumer Rights Act dispute.

Can You Claim What You Haven’t Lost? The ‘No Loss’ Principle Meets s19 CRA 2015

A live claim against a member raises a sharp question: if no money has changed hands and only deductions are in dispute, has the claimant suffered a recoverable loss?

To Repair or Not to Repair: that is the question

A customer drops off a car three months after purchase and asks for a refund. You might have a right to repair, but touch a spanner without clear permission and you could turn a winnable case into an unwanted rejection.

The Consumer Rights Act 2015: Bête noire or useful tool?

Section 19(14) isn’t a magic wand for consumers, and Sections 23 and 24 give traders real leverage. Here’s how to use repairs, disproportionality and usage deductions to keep disputes under control.

Sale or Return: Why “Private Sale” won’t save you from Consumer Rights Act responsibilities

Dealers using Sale or Return cannot hide behind “private sale” labels unless the agency position is made crystal clear from the advert onward. Miss that step and you risk CRA 2015 claims and a DMCCA 2024 breach.

30 Days to Hand the Keys Back: How the Short-Term Right to Reject Really Works

Think a new fault lets buyers walk away, no questions asked? Not quite. Discover why the burden of proof is on the consumer, and how dealers can stay one step ahead.

When no title means no sale

Four years after selling a Range Rover, a trader was hit with a demand for a full refund when the vehicle was seized in Spain.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.