Disclose or not to disclose, that is the question

legal updates

It is imperative that you know what is required to be disclosed, when to disclose the documents, and what your legal duty is both before proceedings and when a claim is issued.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

We may all recall some of Shakespeare from our school days, but to disclose or not to disclose in civil proceedings is a very important matter.

Recently, in a case for one of our members, a document had been requested prior to any claim commencement. Normally, we would consider this to be a “fishing” exercise and not something that could prove any form of assistance. However, think again… the general rules of disclosure within court proceedings are that each party has a duty to disclose to the other the documents that they have in their care and control, even if they are detrimental.

In our member’s case, a claim had not yet been issued but the proposed claimant sought a certain document from our member, who had decided the document was unimportant and not worth bothering with. The resulting problem was that our member found themselves facing an application under civil procedure rule 31.16, which provides that on application before a claim commences if the party is likely to be a party to subsequent proceedings and a request has been asked of them to disclose a document, then the court can order that the document is disclosed. If the document is no longer in the party’s control, they must provide an explanation to the court. As with most applications, costs follow the event, and unfortunately, our member had to pay costs, but they did avoid paying more than they should have because we were able to resolve the matter without the need for attendance at court so saving on this fee, the preparation fee for the other party, and the litigation fee.

That said, it was still a costly error to make.

It is imperative that you know what is required to be disclosed, when to disclose the documents, and what your legal duty is both before proceedings and when a claim is issued.

A document for these purposes means anything in which information of any description is recorded. When considering disclosure with us, any correspondence that has passed between our members and ourselves, including attendance notes of our conversations will not be disclosed because they are protected by privilege. However, other documents central to the case such as a sales invoice, experts report, and pre-delivery inspection records all amount to disclosure.

The above serves as a helpful reminder that if you are asked for a document before court proceedings commence, please take legal advice, it could save you a packet.

Now, back to more Shakespeare…

MotorDeskA car dealership management platform that combines all the tools your business needs into a single, unified and modern platform.

Available on all your devices via your web browser or the dedicated MotorDesk desktop and mobile apps.

Adrian BrazierLegal AdvisorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Nominal Damages

The aim of the court in civil litigation is to put the parties back in the position they were in had the contract not been breached.

Look what you could have won!

The judge was of the view that it would be inappropriate to require our client to proceed blind or adjourn and prejudice their position.

Strange things are afoot with the Online Claims Portal!

It is now absolutely imperative that all claims received by clients are forwarded to us upon receipt as any delay might prove fatal to one’s cause.

Your Evidence Is Vital

As opposing witnesses give different accounts of what has happened, some cases really will hinge on which version of events the judge prefers.

Claim Dismissed: No Proof of Fault at Purchase

Our member argued that numerous issues could have caused the overheating and ultimate failure.

Finance Company Unhappy with Court Ruling

The court found that the claim and particulars were inadequate and the finance company was told they had to submit a compliant claim/particulars.

Detailed records avoid post-sale issues

The Claimant was only entitled to compensation for the cost of repairs to the locks, which were considered likely to have been faulty at the point of sale and was awarded £385.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.