Claims for personal injury arising from stress

legal updates

In a recent appeal case (Dickens v O2plc) some interesting points were made which should act as guidance for employees when dealing with potential 'stress' cases.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

In a recent appeal case (Dickens v O2plc) some interesting points were made which should act as guidance for employees when dealing with potential ‘stress’ cases. A previous case (Hatton v Sutherland) appeared to present some difficulties for employee claimants but this case suggests the difficulties may not be significant in proving the case. 

In all cases of negligence there are particular elements:

a)  Reasonable foreseeability
The fact that the employee previously complained about the stress and had been coming in late and had told the line manager she didn’t know how long she could keep going before getting ill, was enough to say it was reasonably foreseeable.

b)  Breach of duty of care
The company should have sent the employee home even though not signed off by her GP.  An offer of counselling was insufficient.

c)  Causation 
O2 were held to have caused the stress.

d)  Stress is still not treated seriously by many employers but it is important to be aware of the early signs to avoid claims

HaswentWebsites for dealers small and large

Composer is a next-gen automotive platform that has been designed from the ground up to give you an intuitive way to promote your stock. You have extensive stock management options, and you'll gain a brilliantly responsive new website to advertise your stock, starting at just £39.99/month.

Dennis ChapmanIn remembrance of Dennis Chapman 1951 -2015Read More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Pandemic impact on annual leave entitlement

The change in March 2020 allowed for four weeks of annual leave to be carried over. So, as a reminder, any carried over leave must be used in 2022!

Right to work – adjusted checks extended to 30 September 2022

Job applicants and existing employees can send scanned documents or a photo of documents for checks using email or a mobile app, rather than sending originals.

Changes to pre-employment checks on the right to work in the UK

The current laws regarding pre-employment checks on foreign recruits is due to change from 6 April 2022.

End of COVID-19 restrictions – Employment implications

Until 24 March 2022, Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) will continue to be available to employees who self-isolate.

Employment Bill

Flexible working request is already in place but adjustments will be made which will allow the employee the right to request flexible working from day one of employment.

UK Border Force

Immigration status and the right to work can be complicated, with various scenarios.

Gender critical beliefs are protected

Employees must learn to live with the diversity of opinions in our society unless they are expressed in an objectively offensive and disruptive way.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.