Challenging a Redundancy Dismissal – What Defence does the Employer have?


Employee was offered an alternative position however they did not apply for it, and thus the only option left was to make them redundant.

Author: Dennis Chapman
Reading time: 2 minutes

This article is 8 years old.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

A recent Employment Appeal Tribunal examined if a Tribunal can assess if a Redundancy dismissal is unfair, if they do not plead that the Employer failed to follow correct procedure?

In this case – due to financial problems, the Employer had no option but to restructure the business. The target of the restructure was in the managerial side of the business, as the Employer sought to reduce their 4 Managers down to 2.

Procedurally the Employee was given a consultation letter, seeking to obtain alternative proposals, followed by consultation meetings. The Employee was offered an alternative position however they did not apply for it, and thus the only option left was to make them redundant. The Original Tribunal held that the redundancy was procedurally and substantively fair. The Employee appealed without success.

The message to take from this is the guidance the Tribunal gave to Employers as to what they will consider when assessing a case of this nature, namely:

  • Was there a genuine redundancy situation and were the employees affected warned their jobs were at risk?
  • Did the employer establish that its requirements for employees to carry out work of a particular kind had diminished to a large enough extent that it was now redundant, or had ceased entirely?
  • Did meaningful consultation take place before final decisions were made, and were alternative jobs considered?
  • Was the employee dismissed because of redundancy and no other reason, and was the dismissal reasonable in all the circumstances?

Employers should be asking themselves if they can prove all of these points before seeking to make an employee redundant.

Dennis Chapman

In remembrance of Dennis Chapman 1951 -2015

Read more by this author

Getting in touch

You can contact us via the form or you can call us on 01480 455500.