Capability Dismissals

legal updates

Is there a genuine belief that the employee is not capable of undertaking the job at hand.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

Recent case law suggests that dismissals based on capability must be subject to the same standard of proof as a conduct case, applying 3 Steps:

1) Is there a genuine belief that the employee is not capable of undertaking the job at hand

If so:

2) has reasonable investigation been undertaken into the medical condition/ well-being of the employee on which a decision can be made

If so:

3) Can a genuine decision now be made, with reasonable justifiable grounds to back up that decision?

If all three of these steps are undertaken and can be proven, then a dismissal on the grounds of capability should be deemed fair. Employers should look to make thorough investigation before any decision is made in regards to capability so as to cover their own backs.

Profit BoxDevelop your people like your business depends on it

What most people don’t know is that talent development doesn’t have to be complicated, high risk or expensive. Once they integrate key development stages, the results can be remarkable. Empower your team. Lead your industry. We’re your strategic learning partner, driving performance by moving skills forward.

Dennis ChapmanIn remembrance of Dennis Chapman 1951 -2015Read More by this author

Related Legal Updates

One Email, One Oversight, £19,566: Redeployment Duties in Redundancy

A recent tribunal shows that even a genuine redundancy can be unfair if employers don’t actively support redeployment.

Written Authority Wins the Day: Dealer Beats Finance Company in Release Row

A finance company tried to claw back the price of a car after telling the dealer the buyer could collect.

Default judgment but no claim form?

Here’s how to act quickly, get the paperwork you need, and give yourself the best chance of setting the judgment aside under rule 13.3.

Car Falls From Lift: Liverpool Garage Fined After Worker Crushed

The case highlights the duty to have a safe system of work and proper training for lifting equipment.

Importance of taking your customers’ details!

Garages aren’t legally required to take a customer’s address before repair or sale, but skipping it can stall Torts notices and court action when vehicles are abandoned or not collected.

Bailiffs at the Door? Not So Fast: When ‘Debt Collectors’ Have No Power

A consumer decided our member ‘owed’ them money and sent in so-called heavies to collect. Here is why they had no legal power to enforce anything and what to do if a similar letter lands on your desk.

Motor Finance Consumer Redress Scheme

The FCA has launched a consultation on a motor finance redress scheme that could see average payouts of around £700 where key commission arrangements were not disclosed.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.