Top Tip on the description – One previous owner

legal updates

The use of the description by the motor trader is dangerous and open to prosecution by Trading Standards.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

Over the last few months we have had clients reporting customer complaints about the description – one previous (or former) owner (or two etc previous owners). 

It appears that many motor traders use this description because the Vehicle Registration Document V5 shows one (or two etc) former keeper(s).  The use of the description by the motor trader is dangerous and open to prosecution by Trading Standards.

Firstly, the word ‘owners’ is dangerous in its own right.  A large number of people and business’s may ‘own’ the vehicle and, of course the dealer him/herself is an owner.

Secondly, however, if we get the description involving ‘keepers’ then the problem arises because the dealer is forgetting it is him/her (the dealer) making the description and not what is included on the V5.

Take for example a car that was originally bought by the first keeper A.  A sells it in part exchange to a garage and the garage sell it to keeper B.  B sells it to you.  The V5 that B holds shows one previous keeper.  So when B sold it to you he/she could legitimately say ‘one previous keeper’.

However, when the car is on your forecourt, you would be mis-describing it by saying one previous keeper.  The car, let’s face it, has had two previous keepers A and B.

Motor dealers should be very wary in ensuring any description that they are using it totally correct

HowdenCompetitive, comprehensive, quick

One of the largest independent specialist motor trade brokers in the UK. Our extensive history of supplying insurance to the motor trade means we understand your business needs. By partnering with a specialist insurance broker like us, you get exactly what you need to protect your business.

Dennis ChapmanIn remembrance of Dennis Chapman 1951 -2015Read More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Trading Standards Prosecution of Car Dealers

Notify us of any contact you have with your local Trading Standards Officers at the earliest possible stage of their involvement.

Was this judge simply a FSH out of water?

The buyer issued court proceedings for over £1000 because he did not get the servicing paperwork.

Legal Disputes: Why traders should avoid direct contact

The urge to sort the matter out, or attempt to, can put a strain on the process and you may find yourself in a difficult position.

The etiquette of handling consumer complaints

It is always best practice to get involved while you have the chance and follow the correct process at the very beginning.

A settlement agreement may not protect you

An agreement does not need to be in writing to be binding, but it is much easier to prove the terms of an agreement if there is a documented paper trail.

Implications, assumptions, and confusion – why being clear on your actions could be key to winning

The diagnosis showed the third-party garage had failed to repair the vehicle to a satisfactory standard and this was relayed to the consumer.

Burden of proof? Get your evidence while you can!

The burden of proof reverses for issues raised between 30 days and six months of ownership.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.