Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations, remembered!

legal updates

As of the 1st October 2014 amendments were made to the 2008 Regulations, which gave consumers new rights of redress.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

Rightly, there has been much talk of the Consumer Rights Act 2015 during recent months, but dealers should remember that they must also comply with the requirements of the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations (2008), which prohibit engaging in unfair business practices across five main categories:

1.    Giving false information either verbally, visually or in writing, for example misrepresenting the vehicle’s specification or history at any time before, during or after the transaction.

2.    Giving insufficient information omitting or hiding important information, for example failing to disclose the existence and results of all checks carried out on the vehicle’s mechanical condition, history and mileage, or failing to draw the consumers attention to the key elements of any warranty e.g. what’s covered, claim limits and conditions of use.

3.    Acting aggressively for example using high pressure selling techniques to sell a vehicle or associated finance or warranty.

4.    Failing to act in accordance with reasonable expectations of what’s acceptable

5.    Ban of 31 specific practices to include, amongst others: falsely claiming to be a signatory to a Code of Practice; falsely claiming to be approved, endorsed or authorised by a public or private body; falsely stating that a vehicle will only be available for a very limited time in order to elicit an immediate decision to buy.

As of the 1st October 2014 amendments were made to the 2008 Regulations, which gave consumers new rights of redress.

Specifically, if a consumer has been the victim of a misleading action, for example a false statement or aggressive selling, then they will have the right to (A) undo the contract, (B) a discount on the price paid, (C) an entitlement to seek damages.

Should you have any doubt as to the nature and effect of the 2008 Regulations or any other Consumer Law matter that might affect your business, then do not hesitate to contact Lawgistics.

MotorDeskA car dealership management platform that combines all the tools your business needs into a single, unified and modern platform.

Available on all your devices via your web browser or the dedicated MotorDesk desktop and mobile apps.

Related Legal Updates

“Running Well”: Two words that cost a consumer £3,300

The judge found our member’s repairs were sound and ruled the email undercut the later allegations, dismissing the claim and awarding expenses.

The photo you didn’t take could cost you thousands

Proving a vehicle’s condition at handover is the difference between recovering costs and footing the bill.

They Broke It, You Don’t Pay: Intervening Acts that defend dealer claims

When damage stems from what a customer did after purchase, you may not be on the hook.

To strike or not to strike

Courts are reluctant to strike out a claim or defence, even where there are procedural breaches. Here’s when CPR 3.4(2) genuinely applies, why summary judgment under Part 24 may be a better route, and what judges look for before taking the drastic step.

Is the legislative framework outdated or misunderstood?

A claimant mixed pre-2015 laws with a post-2015 car purchase and the result was, frankly, embarrassing.

Come On, Baby, Light My Fire

If a car goes up in smoke, does the buyer’s insurance mean the trader escapes liability? Here’s how insurer involvement really works…

Don’t Get Soaked: The Habitation Checks That Stop Motorhome Rejections

Buyers are rejecting motorhomes for damp, leaks and unsafe cabins. Here’s what to inspect in the habitation area and why a simple pre-sale check can save you a costly Consumer Rights Act dispute.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.