Is the discretionary commission argument finally coming to an end?

legal updates

Could this be the final chapter in the finance commission scandal that's plagued the motor trade for years?

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

I wrote my first legal update on this subject matter in May 2021, following the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) ban on discretionary commission arrangement (DCA) on 28 January 2021, and when the streams of letters started to be sent from the bloodthirsty claims management companies attempting to bully our members in paying back thousands of pounds.

Four years later, we are hopefully coming close to the conclusion of the finance commission saga. The Supreme Court hearing is scheduled for 1–3 April 2025, which has been brought by Close Brothers and First Rand Bank Limited after the decision made by the Court of Appeal on 25 October 2024.

The decision made by the Court of Appeal was unexpected by lenders and the motor trade alike, with the judgement confirming that the consumer should be told the amount of commission, and the consumer explicitly consents to it. As you are aware, the FCA’s rules and guidance state that while the existence and nature of the commission have to be disclosed to consumers, the regulator does not require the explicit disclosure of the commission amounts unless the customer specifically requests them.

This decision led to some lenders putting a stop to lending while they amended their paperwork to ensure they were compliant with the new rules off the back of the Court of Appeal hearing.

The FCA’s review is still ongoing, and we are sure that the Supreme Court’s decision in April will have a significant impact on any potential redress scheme the FCA will eventually decide on. We do not believe the redress scheme will have a direct impact on our members, but as we have already seen, the indirect impact is that lenders are running much tighter ships, for example, by being more robust with commission clawbacks and consumer rejections.

If you have any questions or have received correspondence about finance commissions, please do not hesitate to contact Lawgistics.

Automotive ComplianceWE TALK YOUR LANGUAGE, WE KNOW YOUR BUSINESS

Need help with keeping on track with FCA Regulation and Compliance? Partner with Automotive Compliance

John McDougallLegal AdvisorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Motor Finance Commission Claims: FCA and SRA Crack Down on CMCs, Fees and Misleading Adverts

The FCA and SRA have issued clear reminders to Claims Management Companies and law firms: check customers are not already represented, keep termination fees fair, and stop misleading promotions.

Navigating the Return of Part-Exchange Vehicles

When a financed car sale is rejected, what happens to the part-exchange (and its cleared finance) is rarely straightforward.

FCA’s Motor Finance Crackdown: Has the horse already bolted?

The FCA has opened an enforcement investigation into a CMC over motor finance claims, but critics say this should have happened years ago.

Sold a Car and Now They Want a Refund? The Truth About “No Mental Capacity”

A refund demand lands after the sale, claiming the buyer lacked mental capacity. Here’s how to handle these calls, what actually counts as evidence, and when a contract could be void.

Motor Finance Consumer Redress Scheme

The FCA has launched a consultation on a motor finance redress scheme that could see average payouts of around £700 where key commission arrangements were not disclosed.

The FCA £1m Campaign: Better Late Than Never!

The FCA has launched a £1 million campaign to tell motor finance customers they can access compensation without claims firms or lawyers.

Proving the ‘chain of custody’ can be a challenge

Conflicting interests on a used car can turn a simple purchase into a legal minefield. Here’s how to evidence the chain, challenge a finance claim, and spot the red flags before you hand over the cash.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.