Do I have to reply?

legal updates

The lender writes to our member for assistance with paperwork, but our member decides to ignore it.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

This is probably one of the most asked questions by our members when they receive correspondence that relates to historical sales of motor vehicles.

These forms of correspondence come from various sources, such as the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS), motor finance lenders, motor finance brokers, solicitors, and claims management companies.

Due to the ongoing saga with discretionary commission arrangements, we have seen an increase in these types of communications. However, whatever our thoughts are on the matter and the likely outcome of this saga, we still need to treat this correspondence correctly.

An example scenario:
A customer makes a complaint against the lender with regard to a discretionary commission model and they make a complaint to the FOS. The lender writes to our member for assistance with paperwork, but our member decides to ignore it, as the complaint is from a lender they no longer have a business relationship with, and it involved a vehicle sold years ago.

All seems fairly harmless at this point. It is the lender’s complaint, and they need to respond to the FOS so the complaint is investigated fully. However, the lender, in an attempt to mitigate the issue, advises the FOS that they haven’t received a reply from the dealer in this matter.

As the FOS works closely with the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), the FOS reports that it would appear that credit brokers (motor dealers) are not cooperating fully with these complaints.

You then put yourself in the firing line of an FCA investigation and we advise that is something you would not want to be involved with. The FCA will start by looking at your website which is your “shop window” and will start asking questions about representative APRs, commission disclosure statements, complaints procedures, and the list goes on.

As you are aware, Lawgistics are not an automotive compliance firm. However, we can assist when it comes to responding to these types of correspondence as the answer to the question is always, YES!

Wearewood Services LtdMotor Trade Web Specialists

We offer an all-encompassing web, digital & design service specially tailored to the Motor Industry.

John McDougallLegal AdvisorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Motor Finance Commission Claims: FCA and SRA Crack Down on CMCs, Fees and Misleading Adverts

The FCA and SRA have issued clear reminders to Claims Management Companies and law firms: check customers are not already represented, keep termination fees fair, and stop misleading promotions.

Navigating the Return of Part-Exchange Vehicles

When a financed car sale is rejected, what happens to the part-exchange (and its cleared finance) is rarely straightforward.

FCA’s Motor Finance Crackdown: Has the horse already bolted?

The FCA has opened an enforcement investigation into a CMC over motor finance claims, but critics say this should have happened years ago.

Sold a Car and Now They Want a Refund? The Truth About “No Mental Capacity”

A refund demand lands after the sale, claiming the buyer lacked mental capacity. Here’s how to handle these calls, what actually counts as evidence, and when a contract could be void.

They Broke It, You Don’t Pay: Intervening Acts that defend dealer claims

When damage stems from what a customer did after purchase, you may not be on the hook.

Motor Finance Consumer Redress Scheme

The FCA has launched a consultation on a motor finance redress scheme that could see average payouts of around £700 where key commission arrangements were not disclosed.

The FCA £1m Campaign: Better Late Than Never!

The FCA has launched a £1 million campaign to tell motor finance customers they can access compensation without claims firms or lawyers.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.