Porridge for car “clockers”

legal updates

As well as charges for reducing mileages, charges were also proven for conspiracy to defraud and money laundering offences.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

If time were as easy to turn back as the odometers of cars then one wonders whether Erk Dymiter and Krystian Skowronski would have opted to indulge in the car trade as they did.

Following a very long investigation by Trading Standards they were each given 18 month prison sentences. As well as charges for reducing mileages, charges were also proven for conspiracy to defraud and money laundering offences.

We understand that the two used false names and telephone numbers to hide their identities, that cars had been sold with false MOTs and service histories and in some cases, the mileages had been reduced by as much as 100,000 miles.

It is individuals like these who sadly give the entire motor industry an undeserved bad name and are the stories that always hit the headlines.  Regrettably, you will never see a headline saying “Car dealer repairs vehicle despite being under no legal obligation” or “Dodgy consumer tries to cheat car dealer” – although each are far more prevalent.

And whilst we congratulate Trading Standards for their efforts here, it is surprising that there was no reporting of any Order given by the court under the Proceeds of Crime Act. This allows enforcement agencies to recover the ill-gotten financial gains obtained through crime. The press release I read stated that the two of them are “believed to have pocketed thousands of pounds” – which suggests that they may well be re-united with it all once they are out of prison…

Connected Car FinanceReady to take the connected approach?

We’re here to ensure all used car dealerships deliver a better car finance experience for their customers. With over 4,000 approved dealer partners we ensure you are properly supported and connected with a range of flexible finance options, allowing you to lend and your customers to buy in complete confidence.

Jason WilliamsLegal AdvisorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

New & Improved?

Defending proceedings issued relating to whether the lack of a CD player in a new car was an “upgrade” or not.

Inspecting part-exchange vehicles

It is always a good idea to keep a paper trail for any transaction, especially in situations where representations are being made by a consumer.

Commission Disclosure Court Cases

The majority of the cases where court proceedings have been issued about commission disclosure are because our members have either ignored the correspondence or just decided not to engage with these fine upstanding companies.

Do NOT try to take away a consumer’s rights on an invoice

A Welsh Trading Standards department prosecuted a car dealer for “Furnishing a used car invoice to a consumer giving the impression that the consumer had less rights than they actually did.”

Misleading adverts results in £58,000 fine

The result should serve as a warning to all traders to ensure vehicles are accurately described.

What’s that pain between your shoulders? It’s the Trading Standards’ knife in your back!

Trading Standards are meant to provide help and suggestions to ensure future compliance.

Customer ordered to pay our client’s court costs in mileage dispute

A mileage disclaimer sticker was also displayed on dashboard at the time of sale, advising that the mileage must be deemed incorrect unless otherwise stated in writing.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.