Furlough Fatigue

legal updates

It has certainly been interesting to Lawgistics over the past few months how many issues we have dealt with where employees do not want to return from furlough.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

Chances are, this time around during the second lockdown you may have asked some staff to remain at work to facilitate click and collect or delivery sales. This is perhaps different than the situation in March when it is more likely that all staff would have been furloughed.

We have found that many of our clients this time around are experiencing what we have coined ”Furlough Fatigue” Employees that have not been selected for furlough are unhappy they cannot have the time off work. Realistically, if you can stay at home and not work but receive 80% of your usual pay then that is quite appealing to many.

However, this has been very surprising to us. If you are not on furlough it is probably more likely your job is secure for the future so we question why people would want to be chosen for furlough! With so many redundancies being made, we would have thought job security would be peoples top priority.

However, when we actually think of the reasons why people would want to be selected for furlough, there could be many.

Perhaps, it comes down to peoples characters, some need to work for their own mental health and wellbeing. Other people do not require that input and motivation from being at work.

Other considerations could be financial, if an employee is fairly well off they may not need 100% of their pay and therefore see furlough as a bit of a treat! Others, perhaps with young families, require all the money they can get so would not want to be furloughed.

Of course there are medical considerations too, some people would like to be furloughed if they or a family member have an underlying health condition purely to keep them safe.

It has certainly been interesting to Lawgistics over the past few months how many issues we have dealt with where employees do not want to return from furlough. This alongside employees being very unhappy they have not been chosen for furlough has definitely surprised us. It seems logical that people want a job and want to work, especially at a time like this with large amounts of redundancies but the thought process behind furlough, for some employees, is clearly a lot more complicated than that.

Brave AgencyDriving growth in the automotive industry

Brave is an award-winning digital agency offering a comprehensive range of services aimed at helping your business grow. From rebrands and web development to marketing campaigns that get you noticed, we do it all. Since 2000, we’ve helped businesses across the automotive sector reach new heights. Could yours be next?

Stephanie StrachanIn remembrance of Stephanie Strachan 1990-2020Read More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Pandemic impact on annual leave entitlement

The change in March 2020 allowed for four weeks of annual leave to be carried over. So, as a reminder, any carried over leave must be used in 2022!

See you in court… in a year or so…

Before deciding to issue or defend proceedings, it is important to consider how court delays may impact you as a business and as an individual.

End of COVID-19 restrictions – Employment implications

Until 24 March 2022, Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) will continue to be available to employees who self-isolate.

A word of caution – Dismissal of an anti-vaccination employee ruled to be fair

Does this decision lend grounds for employers to dismiss staff refusing a COVID-19 vaccine at present?

COVID-19 and the workplace

We have provided a list of answers to some frequently asked questions regarding COVID-19 and the workplace.

Goodbye 2021, hello 2022!

Despite an excess of 100 different commission claims hitting the Lawgistics’ desks, not one single dealer has had to part with their money.

Key worker claim dismissed

They presented witness statements from family members to back their claims of various things our client was supposed to have said.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.