Advertising a car with no MOT?  Not a defence if the car is unroadworthy

legal updates

If you do sell an unroadworthy vehicle that kills someone, you might be looking at a manslaughter charge too…

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

We recently had a member who sold a vehicle declaring that it had no MOT. They even delivered it to their customer. The customer immediately drove it to an MOT station which declared it to have two dangerous defects.

Our member felt because they had advertised the vehicle as having no MOT and having not permitted a test drive, they were “in the clear”. However, it is doubtful whether Trading Standards would have agreed.

Indeed, this writer believes that our member had committed a criminal offence under Section 75 of the Road Traffic Act 1988, which makes it an offence to sell, supply or expose for sale or supply a motor vehicle if…

“it is in such a condition that the use of it on a road in that condition would be unlawful by virtue of any provision made by regulations under section 41 of this Act as respects:

(i)brakes, steering gear or tyres, or

(ii)the construction, weight or equipment of vehicles, 

And it is in such a condition that its use on a road would involve a danger of injury to any person.”

The MOT established two dangerous defects – one to the suspension (its “construction”) and another where a brake pipe was about to become detached. Where dangerous defects are found, the car must not be put on the public highway until after those defects have been remedied. This vehicle was clearly sold in that condition and by not warning the buyer that it must not be driven to the MOT station, then the offence had probably been committed.

Car dealers must take “all reasonable steps” to ensure that any car supplied/sold is not unroadworthy as defined by the Road Traffic Act (above). Where it is known or believed that the vehicle may be dangerous, then dealers have to be able to show that they made it clear to the buyer that the vehicle must not be put on the highway, even if it is for the purpose of being MOT’d, unless any dangerous defects have been safely corrected. No test driving and no allowing a purchaser to drive off in it, post-sale.

Feel free to ignore the above warning, but only if you wish to be prosecuted by Trading Standards, receive a criminal record, a hefty fine, and such bad publicity that no one will buy from you again!  Oh, and if you do sell an unroadworthy vehicle that kills someone, you might be looking at a manslaughter charge too…

InvolutionSTAFF UNIFORM | PROMOTIONAL WEAR | MERCHANDISE | BUSINESS GIFTS

Leading experts in print, promotional clothing, staff uniforms, branded merchandise and PPE. Involution is your brand partner for promotional marketing and workwear, a one-stop-shop for your branded marketing needs for any business size and industry.

Jason WilliamsLegal AdvisorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

A New MOT is Not Absolute Defence to “Unroadworthy” Prosecutions

Clients ought to avoid relying entirely on a MOT pass and should undertake a comprehensive and honest pre-delivery inspection.

Cessation of MOT licence averted

The VEM’s findings amounted to a breach of the provisions of the Motor Vehicles (Tests) Regulations 1981 (as amended) and disciplinary action was commenced.

MOT Testers and Authorised Examiners – please be vigilant

We ask all testers and their supervisors to remember that you have to be accountable for every action or inaction.

Judge gives short shrift to Porsche claim

Sold without warranty, with a current MOT and after a thorough pre-delivery inspection (PDI), which revealed no faults.

COVID-19: MOT, maintenance and service centres remain open for business, despite the lockdown

A valid MOT, extended or not, is no guarantee that a vehicle remains roadworthy for the duration.

COVID-19: MOT Centres and Garages can stay open …but for how long?

For those selling cars, many of our dealers have been following our advice and have moved to distance sales.

This Morris is major not minor

Through various means, plus an amazing stroke of luck, I managed to reacquire the family Morris Minor

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.